Follow Us

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

International Trade Industry News

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

The New Trade Enforcement Unit

  
  
  

Presidential SealObama announces new Trade Enforcement Unit

If you didn't catch President Obama's State of The Union Address last week, you missed the announcement of a new Trade enforcement Unit. As part of his trade policy for the coming year, this new team of trade enforcers will allow the US to ensure compliance of fair trade practices. Below is an excerpt from the Presidents speech:

"I will go anywhere in the world to open new markets for American products. And I will not stand by when our competitors don’t play by the rules. We’ve brought trade cases against China at nearly twice the rate as the last administration –- and it’s made a difference. Over a thousand Americans are working today because we stopped a surge in Chinese tires. But we need to do more. It’s not right when another country lets our movies, music, and software be pirated. It’s not fair when foreign manufacturers have a leg up on ours only because they’re heavily subsidized."

"Tonight, I’m announcing the creation of a Trade Enforcement Unit that will be charged with investigating unfair trading practices in countries like China. There will be more inspections to prevent counterfeit or unsafe goods from crossing our borders. And this Congress should make sure that no foreign company has an advantage over American manufacturing when it comes to accessing financing or new markets like Russia. Our workers are the most productive on Earth, and if the playing field is level, I promise you -– America will always win."

US Trade Representative comments on the make-up of the new Trade Enforcement Unit

US Trade Representative Ron Kirk has said in the press that this new agency will include intelligence officials as well as representatives from other agencies.

"We don't want them to make ... [the] bet that we don't have the resources to come after them if they're intentionally and unfairly discriminating against American exporters," Kirk said.

The office of the US Trade Representative has only had about 250 employees. The new Trade Enforcement Unit would expand the capabilities of the US to investigate and represent cases to the World Trade Organization (WCO).

Seeks to curb unfair trade practices of China

While the Trade Enforcement Unit will investigate unfair trade practices from any country, it is pretty obvious that the focus is primary on China. It is no secret that The U.S. trade deficit with China is expected to hit record levels. U.S. trade officials say their main complaints against China are barriers to its agricultural and services markets, discriminatory industrial policies and weak intellectual property rights protection.

What do you think about this new trade enforcement unit? Do you think they will help increase fair trade practices?

Comments

What I believe I heard was another layer of government 'oversight' just to prove that the current multitude of bureaus, agencies, departments et al cannot do the job/assignments they already have. To me it smacks of DHS all over again. There are "National Security Issues" that hold up trade, including the risk of US products being diverted to a party that the US government does not wish to benefit from our technology. But in most cases a very similar and comperable technology (without controllable US content) can be purchased from other countries (including Germany, France, Russia, China, Japan etc.) Example: China now has the fastest computer, and our Cray system is a little bit short by measure. We already have the Department of Defence's Golden Sentry program, and the Department of State's Blue Lantern program, plus the Department of Commerce's export enforcement group (e.g. watching for diversion to a different party after the original sale.) I will suggest we watch carefully what the President has in mind as "further government help" as I think it will add cost due to further government structure and then the cost of compliance by industry. A lession I learned years ago, from history, is that if the government (even one elected by the people) imposes repressive controls (think: 18th Amendendment) the population (read: businesses) will find a way around the bottleneck. In this case it can be a multi-national corporation that knows of multiple sources of articles that can sold by an element of their global enterprise without worry of violating a US law. Think of the Haliburton Corporation as a model. 
 
I do wish the President would find a way to pull regulations back instead of piling on. As for risk and or liability.....I think we have enough laws already on the books, and related trade regulations that can be used (read: enforced) if the business community would educate themselves as to what they all are. 
 
Here is an example: Boeing paid Uncle Sam a $15,000,000 fine for including a $2000 navigation chip into a number of 737-800 model aircraft sold into the export market (bringing cash into the USA), except that $2000 chip happened to be developed up front for the Maverick missle system (e.g. 'dual use article'). The right hand did not know what the left hand was promoting. Enough.
Posted @ Tuesday, January 31, 2012 2:46 PM by James G. Shaw III CSCP
From what I understand, this new team is for enforcement of existing laws. I don't think there are any new regulations.
Posted @ Wednesday, February 01, 2012 3:01 PM by Bryce Hanson
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics