Follow Us

Subscribe via E-mail

Your email:

International Trade Industry News

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

HS Code versus Reality

  
  
  

HS Code versus Reality

The Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System (HS) of tariff nomenclature is the standard by which International trade is classified. All existing products can be classified with an HS code by utilizing the General Rules of Interpretation. This is the idea anyway.

It doesn't take long to find weaknesses in the system. Some of the most basic products can elicit confusion when trying to assign an HS code.

What's a tomato?

tomato

Let’s take the example of the humble tomato. The tomato is a fruit. Period. According to the dictionary, a fruit is "the sweet and fleshy product of a tree or other plant that contains seed and can be eaten as food." Now there may be disagreements about whether a tomato is "sweet" but anyone that has had homegrown garden tomatoes know the truth about the sweetness of tomatoes.

However, when you try to assign an HS code to tomatoes, you will soon find that the dictionary definition doesn't apply. At the highest level of the HTS, edible vegetables are under "07" and fruits are under "08". Where does the tomato fall? According to the HTS, Fresh or chilled tomatoes' four digit HS code is 0702. Notice the first two numbers?

According to the US Supreme Court

It gets better. Back in 1893, there was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that affirmed that the tomato should be classified as a vegetable. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nix_v._Hedden

While this is a pretty mundane issue, it is a funny inconsistency to point out. When I posed the question of whether tomatoes are classified as fruit or vegetable to trade groups in Linkedin, the responses weren't uniformly unanimous.

 Linkedin Group Responses
Group Name Fruit Vegetable

Customs Compliance*

9 (52%)

8 (47%)

Customs Law Group*

8 (38%)

13 (61%)

Customs Specialists

3 (15%)

17 (85%)

Global Trade Compliance Management

3 (37%)

5 (62%)

Global Trade Compliance Professionals

1 (14%)

6 (85%)

US Customs Compliance Professionals

2 (16%)

10 (63%)

Total  26 (31%) 59 (69%) 
*the wording of the survey was slightly different in these groups. It referred specifically to how the Supreme Court classified tomatoes and not the US HTS.

The survey was not to insult the intelligence of trade professionals or even to test their knowledge. It was just to point out the importance of proper HS classification and how easy it is to get tripped up in the language. In this case it isn't that big of a deal since the duty is the same for chapter 7 and 8.

I guess the old adage applies, “Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad.” Happy HS Coding!

Tags: ,

Comments

Thanks for this.. but I would it would have been good if you had attributed the quote :)-
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:03 PM by /pd
My Bad /pd, but for the record, two people made the same comment in different groups. Ergo: adage.
Posted @ Thursday, February 02, 2012 12:21 PM by Bryce Hanson
In brief. Rule 1 of the HS stipulates the following: classification according to the terms of the heading (07.02: tomatoes, fresh or chilled). Note that there is no reference to vegetable or fruit in this heading text. Similar situation for prepared or preserved tomatoes in heading 20.02. Furthermore, the titles of the Chapters (edible vegetables and edible fruits) are for reference only. So what was the point raised?
Posted @ Friday, February 03, 2012 3:07 AM by IW
This was pointed out by a commenter in the Customs Law Group. (He will remain namless since I haven't asked permission to use the quote) 
 
"As a matter of interest, don't the GRI's state, inter alia, something along the lines of the titles of Sections, Chapters and sub-Chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and the legal notes.  
 
Therefore, a tomato is a tomato as per heading 07.02. It is not classified as a fruit or vegetable but as a tomato.  
 
Although legal note 2 to Chapter 7 includes fruits as vegetables - now I am confused ;)"
Posted @ Friday, February 03, 2012 12:27 PM by Bryce Hanson
In most cases there is a reason or sort of logic for some of the things that at first glace seem odd about the HS. I came across those court rulings years ago when I was contemplating an appeal to reclassify tomatoes as fruits. The logic behind it relates to the quote, a tomato goes in a vegetable salad, niot a fruit salad, or a topping for ice cream. It is a matter of "end use", a concept often used in classification. 
 
Another one that always puzzled me was computers, why are they in chapter 84 (machinery) and not 85 (electric machinery)? Now right off the bat those titles are misleading, much of chapter 84 is electricly powered. But 85 contains the electronics, the radios, stereos, TVs and all the parts that make up a computer today. It took some research but I now know how computers ended up in 84. Anyopne else have a guess?
Posted @ Monday, February 20, 2012 10:35 AM by Mike Neville
Automatic data processing machines, as 'computers' are called in the HS, belong to Chapter 84, since they belong to the class of office equipment (current headings 84.69 to 84.73). Note that this reference was already there in the 1952 (!) nomenclature of the WCO: the CCCN.
Posted @ Monday, February 20, 2012 10:47 AM by IW
Post Comment
Name
 *
Email
 *
Website (optional)
Comment
 *

Allowed tags: <a> link, <b> bold, <i> italics