Knowledge Center

The EU’s Digital Product Passport (DPP) has been introduced under the Ecodesign for Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR). It is often discussed as a sustainability and transparency initiative but the scale of the shift is rarely mentioned.  

The last few years have changed the way many importers think about global trade. Previously predictable costs can now change overnight. With that in mind, more and more companies are looking at Foreign Trade Zones (FTZs) to manage duty costs and create more flexibility when sourcing.

Regulators are looking beyond what was declared on a customs entry and examining the business activity surrounding a transaction. This represents a meaningful change in trade enforcement.

Most multinational organizations already operate across markets covered by multiple FTAs. Yet utilization remains inconsistent across industries and trade lanes despite the scale of potential duty savings available.

For importers, the most important question is no longer whether tariff enforcement is intensifying. It is how enforcement is actually happening.

Across the industry, organizations are shifting away from reactive cost management toward structural duty optimization strategies, rethinking how goods enter, move through, and exit the United States. One strategy consistently rising to the top: Foreign Trade Zones (FTZs).

Many companies make a critical mistake: they assume Foreign Trade Zones (FTZs) and bonded warehouses are interchangeable solutions. They are not.

HS2028 represents a structural recalibration of the classification framework importers rely on daily. This is not a cosmetic update. It is a compliance event that requires planning.

Import Tariffs enforcement is accelerating amid tariff volatility. Learn what the $54M customs-duty settlement signals about tariff evasion risk, HTS governance, & mitigation strategies.